|
界天才霍金教授从高层的自我否定【宇宙大爆炸等理论】进一步暴露?承认?世界物理学的总危机?
楼主
来源:newtonli123@newtonli123 9/12/2010 10:09:00 PM
世界天才霍金教授从高层的自我否定【宇宙大爆炸等理论】进一步暴露?承认?世界物理学的总危机? Professor Hawking, the world's talent level of self-denial [such as the Big Bang theory] for further exposure? Recognition? General crisis of the world of physics? 而不少批评家、科学人则把它故意引人宗教,说霍金的讲话是对神论的最大的挑战和冲击,而掩盖的则是现代物理学的总危机,原子理论,相对论,宇宙大爆炸论…..LHC...工程的危机。让人怀疑是否要又要像哥白尼时代那样,历史一进步,总有人去动员不同时代的”宗教”势力来围攻觉科学的觉醒?围剿新说法?铲出新理论?这次围攻的是霍金,但进行围剿和砍头的可能是newton.li?原因是历史进步总是影响到一些人的权力和利益。更多的人企图阻止自己错误的“科学信仰”也就是一个中心的原子论,以光为中心的两个相对论,一个中心宇宙的大爆炸论,没有事实根据的所有其它中心论的灭亡和颓势。必然值得人类的警惕!而人类包括我们对宗教神学的珍视,只是道德的有用成分,而不是那些没有事实根据的永远不可能实现的神话。而道德则是由,自由民主的监督和大家都来监督的本质构成。离开了这个宇宙的自然规律和本质,不给人民大众相互教育提高、对所有人的错误行为,进行批评的自由,对各级权力进行监督的自由,那还有是么道德。同样的道理无论是物理学理论,神学理论,宗教理论,政治理论,都是左右人类思维,行为,甚至生命的大学说,大理论。任何伟人,圣人,民族在创建这些大学说,大理论时,要都向人类负责,而不能是不负责任的胡编邪说,才算有道德?但具体的标准应该是有无限的事实根据,受万物的认同和支持,能接受和经得住人类的批评,监督和挑战,才是正确的,负债任的理论。这样才算有道德,而不允许批评、监督、禁止任何人进行监督和批评的理论和行为,才算有道德?把批评监督投入不同时代的监狱,坐牢,围攻,钉死在十字架上,乱石打死,放火烧死,将要被砍下头来才算是有道德? 希望所有的评论家,科学人能正视问题的本质,快快觉醒,皈依正确的思想和理论。像霍金那样如此大度,能成为有错就认错,发现错误就改的,让万物这个“上帝”欢心,而成为世界真正的精英和伟人。 Newton.li
Professor Hawking, the world's talent level of self-denial [such as the Big Bang theory] for further exposure? Recognition? General crisis of the world of physics? 世界天才霍金教授从高层的自我否定【宇宙大爆炸等理论】进一步暴露?承认?世界物理学的总危机? Hawking's new book on The Grand Design 』『 book revealed some of Sept. 3 points lead to strong reviews in the world. Newton.li physicist Stephen Hawking is very welcome to the British mathematical astronomers, physicists in the world, the scientific elite with a lot of facts to expose many traditional theories of physics and astrophysics case of errors and the awakening. Let the error from the original theory of Hawking suddenly thought out ... ..? Allowing him famous in the world [Brief History of Time], had been subjected to many scientific elite against the world, newton.li physicists, but physics is LMPN theory, many times 』『 The Grand Design errors, Higgs, Hawking's erroneous theory and claims of direct criticism, and repeated worldwide criticism. Let him [A Brief History of Time] in the center of God to a small mass for the center of the Big Bang theory to say and a significant change ... ..? The mention of the recent explosion of things, to suddenly disclose 』『 The Grand Design of the contents of the book, complete change in the original wrong. Mistakes and wrongs of course be welcomed around the world. The main points are 4.1. Deny the existence of God (the existence of God or the infinite can not find any facts and evidence). 2. Recognize the existence of gravitational law (natural negation of Einstein's space-time) 3 universe is naturally occurring (rather than the big bang?). 4. The distance between Earth and sun, and the quality of relationships, creating the special environment of the Earth, the solar system outside of there ... .... (Recognition of the existence of multi-center). And many critics, science and people's eyes deliberately introduced religion, said Hawking's speech is a God of the biggest challenges and impact, while the cover of the general crisis of modern physics, atomic theory, relativity, universe explosion of ... .. LHC ... engineering the crisis. Cast doubt on whether or not to have to do as the Copernican era, history of a progressive, people have to mobilize the various era of "religious" forces to siege the awakening sense of science? Suppress the new version? Shovel out the new theory? The siege is the Hawking, but to crush and beheadings may be newton.li? The reason is historical progress always affect the rights and interests of some people. More people tried to stop their false "scientific faith" is a center of atomic theory, and light for the two relativistic center, a center of the universe's big bang theory, no factual basis for the demise of all other centers and the weakness of . Certainly worthy of human vigilance! And human beings, including the value of our theology, is a useful component of morality, rather than those unfounded myth can never be achieved. While ethics is, free and democratic supervision, and we have to monitor the nature of composition. Left the natural order of the universe and nature, not to the masses mutual education increased for all wrongful acts, freedom to criticize, the power to conduct oversight at all levels of freedom, then there is What moral. By the same token, whether physical theories, theology, religious theory, political theory, is about human thinking, behavior, and even the university of life that great theory. Any great man, saints, national universities, said the creation of these great theories, we should all be responsible to the human, not an irresponsible Hubian heresy, be considered moral? However, the standard should be a specific infinite factual basis, subject to all the recognition and support, to accept and withstand the Piping Ren Lei, Jian Du and Tiao Zhan, is correct, Fu Zhai any theory. That is a moral, but does not allow criticism, supervision, and to prohibit any person to oversee and criticize the theory and behavior, be considered moral? The criticism and supervision into different era prison, jail, siege, crucifixion, stoning, burning alive, would be considered to be cut off his head there is a moral? Hope that all the critics, the scientific nature of the problem one can face, quickly awakening, conversion right ideas and theories. Hawking did so generous as can be to admit any mistakes, errors were found on the reform, so that all this "God" to please, and become the world's truly elite and great man. Newton.li 2010-9-12 - |