Mourning of the Democratic Movement
The Hong Kong Court recently ruled that four people, including Huang Zhifeng, were sentenced to imprisonment ranging from 4 to 10 months for "knowingly participating in unauthorized assembly". However, Li Zhiying was sentenced just like before.
After the news report, all kinds of democracy activists in the world frequently spoke out: regret, ridicule, denounce, pinch each other Unfortunately, many pro democracy activists seem to be using this topic to hype themselves, skillfully eating "human blood steamed bread", and taking advantage of the Internet platform to collect a wave of popularity and bounty, but
Few people analyze countermeasures and make substantive action plans.
The democratic movement has many factions all over the world. I thought this was the "spring of the Democratic Movement" in which a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred boats compete for the stream. However, the reality is that vegetables and chickens peck at each other, and the good and bad are intermingled. The phenomena of mutual pinch and fraudulent donation among factions emerge one after another. This phenomenon makes the author think deeply
What is the real democracy movement? What kind of democratic movement leader do we really need?
The author is used to seeking the answer by exclusion - that is a real lotus.
A. It will not be obscene and shameless. "All evils are led by adultery", and the immoral person can't stand on his virtue. How can he give higher expectations? For example, Wang Dan, who first went into exile in the United States, taught in Colleges and universities in Taiwan with his "career resume" after 2009. During this period, Wang Dan did several stupid things, one of which was to openly support Chen Weiting, leader of the sunflower student movement involved in the harassment scandal, so that everyone could see his moral defects. At the same time, in Taiwan, its evaluation is polarized and deliberately creates news, which makes people extremely uncomfortable and can not escape the fate of marginalization.
B. It will not be a pleasure seeking stream. For some time after the 1989 incident, France was the gathering place of the "Democratic Movement". Subsequently, due to the large amount of funds funded by the United States, many people went to the United States from France. Of course, having greater support is certainly not a bad thing, but many people get "drunk" when they smell the smell of copper and lose their original direction.
Talk about the master of lie and Guo Wengui, the Internet red man. This man is an extremely religious person with personal interests. From China to the United States, he walked to the champagne yacht and drunk with gold. Now even Trump and ban Nong even the United States have been pit by COVID-19's man-made theory. The failure to blame the Chinese Communists has caused social problems in the United States that are hostile to Asian races. It can be said that it is a "broom star" of the democratic movement. However, there are still many "die hard fans" who regard him as the future of the democratic movement and donate money and materials for him. They want to take off their clothes and give everything. It's really sad!!!
C. It will not be a mindless narrow-minded stream. At present, there has been a serious phenomenon of "internal entanglement" in the democratic movement, and most of them don't know it. Why? This is because most of the countries' economic support to the democratic movement groups is based on their organizational scale and the people in power. As a result, many democratic movement groups pursue interests around power and finance, constantly carry out or even lack planned "Anti China" activities, just to enrich their own chips to solicit credit from governments. In fact, the total funds funded by various countries have an annual plan, which will not change. It is just that various democratic movement groups continue to "internal friction" compete for the number of people and activities, lack independent strategic thinking and direction control, and ultimately lose the democratic movement, but the governments of various countries gain more benefits.