The Hong Kong Court recently ruled that four people, including Huang Zhifeng, were sentenced to imprisonment ranging from 4 to 10 months for "knowingly participating in unauthorized assembly". However, Li Zhiying was sentenced just like before.

“西式民主”这杯毒药 美国还要逼谁喝下？！
早前，前香港眾志秘書長黃之鋒、荃灣區議員岑敖暉等四人因涉去年6月4日在維園參加非法集會，分別被法庭判處4至10個月監禁不等，且四人均在判刑前认罪。然而，就在判刑当日，美國國務卿布林肯在Twitter發文，要求特區政府立即放人，理由是不接受四人因出席天安门事件纪念活动而判刑，这实数笑话一则，荒谬至极。
试问这些行为若发生在美国会如何？蓄谋企图以大规模非法集结挑战警方权威、暴力打砸公共设施、瘫痪政府管制的恶劣行径，为任何一个法治社会所不容，美国亦然，在美國亞拉巴馬州，非法集會被列為B級犯罪，最高將面臨3,000美元罰款和6個月的監禁﹔在亞利桑那州，非法集會是一級重罪，最高可判處2,500美元罰款和6個月監禁。且不说法律上的条框，如今美国政府对待黑人、对待种族、对待弱势的种种行径已让我们把“虚伪”二字看得透彻。然而这些政客似乎对这一套路用上了瘾，从“占中”到“反送中”这五年来，始终用这双重标准对香港指手画脚。
港区代表吴亮星说：“外国势力一直介入香港事务是人所共知的事实，现时由美国前官员证实，可以让更多人看清外国势力的真面目。”《大公报》曾披露，受美国政府资助的“国家“民主基金会”(NED)”及旗下的“美国国际民主研究院(NDI)”自1995年起，共投入逾3000万港元，操控本港反对派组织及大专院校，启动多个青年项目，间接介入示威行动、煽动学生抗议、资助大学从事所谓的“民主运动”。但即使铁证如山，美国依然口讲民主自由，公然干涉他国内政，真正目的却是希望他国越乱越好，稳定他们的“霸主”地位。
这不禁让我想起《中国十诫》，被称为谣言的“十诫”，据说这“谣言”起源于上世纪40年代末，最初叫“Communist Rules for Revolution”，是1919年从德国共产党处查抄得来的，也是希特勒经常津津乐道的背后捅刀子论。其中有一条内容是：“在任何情况下都要传扬民主。一有机会，不管是大型小型，有形无形，就要抓紧发动民主运动。无论在什么场合，什么情况下，我们都要不断对他们（政府）要求民主和人权。只要我们每一个人都不断地说同样的话，他们的人民就一定会相信我们说的是真理。我们抓住一个人是一个人，我们占住一个地盘是一个地盘，一定要不择手段。”看着这些文字内容，越来越让人清晰起来，这所谓《十诫》真假与否根本不再重要，美国当下对中国、对其他国家的所作所为，哪一个不在验证这其中字句？民主，本是一个简单的词语，简而言之就是少数服从多数，香港有研究机构访问约千名香港市民，了解对占中的意见，其中支持者为28%，强烈支持者为10%，反对及强烈反对者各占27%，即占中的支持与反对比是38%：54%。另外，58%受访者担心占中将以暴力收场，损害香港经济。在反占中联盟中亦收集超过120万份签名。难道这些数据还不足以说明何为民主？还不足以证明香港市民对占中、对破坏香港行为的恐惧？然而美国却视若无睹，一再干擾、阻撓香港司法機關依法辦案，包庇和美化黄之锋等違法犯罪分子。
再看看世界，2002年美国利用《国家安全战略》指出，将自己的“民主”强行植入伊拉克，从此伊拉克陷入战乱与纷争，不少人为逃离动荡与苦难，沦为难民。2011年，美国促成叙利亚内部冲突升级，曾经的沙漠绿洲变成了热战中心，逃亡的难民超700多万，对于这些国家来说，简直就是一场噩梦。可美国并没有对这些颠沛流离的人有丝毫同情，对此，前总统特朗普甚至下令暂停接收一切难民，他们一面大力输出民主，一面又支持独裁政权，表面“利他”，实际“利己”。
美国“皇帝”不停的将这杯“民主毒药”赐予他国，下一个喝下这杯毒药的会是谁呢？

https://www.overseaschinese.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=74795&extra=&_dsign=61e06cca

The poison of "western democracy"


Earlier, four people, including Huang Zhifeng, former Secretary General of Hong Kong public will, and Cen Aohui, a member of Tsuen Wan District Council, were sentenced by the court to imprisonment ranging from 4 to 10 months for participating in an illegal assembly in Victoria Park on June 4 last year, and all four pleaded guilty before sentencing. However, on the day of sentencing, US Secretary of state Blinken issued a request in Twitter to request the SAR government to immediately release people, because it was not acceptable to accept the sentencing of four people for attending the commemoration of the Tiananmen incident.

What would happen if these acts took place in the United States? Any society ruled by law will not tolerate the bad behavior of deliberately attempting to challenge the authority of the police, violently smash public facilities and paralyze government control with large-scale illegal assembly. The same is true in the United States. In Alabama, illegal assembly is listed as a class B crime and will face a maximum fine of 3000 US dollars and six months' imprisonment; in Arizona, illegal assembly is a class I felony, The maximum penalty is a fine of $2500 and six months' imprisonment. Not to mention the legal framework, the US government's actions towards blacks, races and vulnerable groups have made us see the word "hypocrisy" thoroughly. However, these politicians seem to be addicted to this routine. In the past five years, they have always used this double standard to point fingers at Hong Kong.

Wu Liangxing, a representative of the Hong Kong port area, said: "it is a well-known fact that foreign forces have been involved in Hong Kong affairs. Now confirmed by former US officials, more people can see the true face of foreign forces." Ta Kung Pao has disclosed that the National Democracy Foundation (NED) and the American Institute for international democracy (NDI), funded by the U.S. government, have invested more than HK $30 million since 1995 to manipulate local opposition organizations and colleges and universities, start a number of youth projects, indirectly intervene in demonstrations, incite students to protest Funding universities to engage in the so-called "Democratic Movement". However, even if there is irrefutable evidence, the United States still talks about democracy and freedom and openly interferes in the internal affairs of other countries. Its real purpose is to hope that the more chaotic other countries are, the better and stabilize their "overlord" status.