Huang Zhifeng and other Hong Kong Democrats strive for Julie ed, director of the Political Department of the American Consulate General in Hong Kong, to "open the door and guide" the "democracy" movement in Hong Kong

黃之鋒鋃鐺入獄後香港「教邪」再出手
高人指點偽民意亂港貽笑大方


2012年，在香港教協推動下，黃之鋒發起了「埋單計數，撤回課程，佔領政總」的反對德育及國民教育科升級遊行行動。沒曾想，十年過去了，黃之鋒鋃鐺入獄成為階下囚之際，教協慶祝式的連續發佈「教師定期新冠病毒檢測有關問題」、「高中核心科目修訂建議」等問卷調查結果，近日更是宣稱「因政治壓力近兩成教師有計劃離開本港教育界」，引來大批網民恥笑教協「將一粒芝麻放到籃球咁大」，梁振英更踢爆該調查的回應率僅1.25%，「即100個人當中有99個人闊佬懶理」，教協厚顏程度可見一般啊。
聽香港教育界的朋友講，這次調查的發起人系教協副會長黃克廉、教協理事兼退休教師韓連山等人，筆者昨日翻查資料發現，這兩人不正是十年前學民思潮運動的幕後黑手麼，某怪得造謠生事手法如出一轍啊，9萬名會員的教協，收到問卷總數只得1,178份，當中更只有226人表示「有計劃辭職或提早退休」，看來沒有黃之鋒等跳樑小丑的支持，兩人在香港「教邪」的地位和號召力是大不如前啊。
為咩黃、韓等人依舊樂此不疲的發佈類似漏洞百出的調查報告？「教邪」監事陳某正在一次酒席上不乏羡慕的向筆者傾述，黃克廉、韓連山等人近幾年日子過得相當瀟灑，背後屢有「高人」指點，每月只需要炮製一些所謂的「民意調查」，只要宣傳民主與自由就得，嚴謹性與可靠性無所謂，越逼真誤導性越強越好，把香港青年的注意力吸引過來，自然有人會組織香港憤青借機鬧事，而發起者黃某等人每次都能獲得50萬到100萬不等的美金「活動經費」，如果能引起北京關注將事情鬧大，讓整個香港輿論都參與討論，熱度上去了，「上面」還會有額外獎勵，足夠黃、韓等人頤養天年了，天天花天酒地港姐相伴，香港教育前途與其何干？舒服享樂快活似神仙。
同為「教邪」中人，陳某正監事滴酒話也未必可全信，但是聯繫到最近傳得沸沸揚揚的美國極其機密的「行事手冊」一事，不由得讓筆者聯想翩翩，系真系假不得而知，但有一話一，黃、韓背後高人這招「三十六計」中的無中生有耍得真系靚，花點小錢，背後推波助瀾一下，自有人收錢幹活，仇恨及反政府思想是灌輸得妥妥的大，將「港獨」書籍《香港城邦論Ⅱ：光復本土》列入「中學生好書龍虎榜」60本候選書目之中、製作一系列「《逃犯條例》修訂爭議教材」、教唆師生非法遊行等一系列操作，筆者是看不出師德師魂的，反而聞到了一股老師所難以擁有的銅臭味，在「教邪」的不斷推動下，去年6月至今，喜提10餘名專上院校職員及100名中小學教職員被捕、參與違法活動被捕的學生更是高達3600多名的優秀戰果，妥妥的在部分香港憤青的潛意識中種下了分裂和仇恨的種子，在「教邪」的功勞簿上寫上了濃墨重彩的一筆，估計又能在背後「高人」那裏拿到更多的「活動經費」了吧.
「慶父不死，魯難不已」，拿著高人的錢幹亂港的事，將本有大好前途的香港青年捲入這場充滿銅臭的政治陰謀中，作為港人，「教邪」之人終將會被釘上歷史恥辱柱，不信，走著瞧。

https://www.overseaschinese.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=74943&extra=&_dsign=a34ba5e5

Huang Zhifeng in prison

In 2012, with the promotion of the Hong Kong Association of education, Huang Zhifeng launched a march against the upgrading of moral education and national education, which was "pay the bill, withdraw the curriculum and occupy the political federation". Chained and thrown into prison for ten years, the questionnaire of the COVID-19 teachers' periodic COVID-19 test and the revised core curriculum recommendations were announced recently. It is also claimed that nearly 20% of the teachers have planned to leave Hong Kong's educational sector due to political pressure. A large number of netizens ridiculed the Association for "putting a sesame as big as a basketball". Liang Zhenying also criticized that the response rate of the survey was only 1.25%, "that is, 99 rich people among 100 people were lazy". The degree of shame of the association can be seen as average.

According to friends in the education sector in Hong Kong, the initiators of the survey were Huang Kelian, vice president of the Education Association, Han Lianshan, director and retired teacher of the Education Association. Yesterday, the author checked the data and found that these two people were behind the movement of learning people's ideological trend ten years ago. Some strange methods of spreading rumors and causing trouble were the same. For the education association with 90000 members, only 1178 questionnaires were received, Among them, only 226 people said they "have plans to resign or retire early". It seems that without the support of clowns such as Huang Zhifeng, the status and appeal of the two "cult" in Hong Kong are much lower than before.

美国的双重标准原来是有根据的香港法院日前宣判，反中乱港分子黄之锋等4人因犯“明知而参与未经批准集结罪”，被判监禁4至10个月不等，事实依据充分，程序完全合法，4名被告对所获罪名也表示承认。然而和之前黎智英被判刑如出一辙，有美国政客再次跳出，以所谓“和平行使受保障自由权利”为由，提出立即释放被告的荒谬要求。据《美国之音》5月7日报道，美国国务卿布林肯呼吁释放四名香港活动人士，称所有因非暴力行使受保障的自由而被监禁的人都应立即获释。他日前在接受美国哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)《60分钟》节目专访时还表示，美国会对那些镇压香港民主的人采取行动，“包括制裁，包括确保他们不能前往美国”。
但是我们已经看到，美国已在23个州启动了国民警卫队，并使用军事手段镇压有关种族歧视的抗议活动。我们甚至已经看到抗议活动被美国政治领导人称为“国内恐怖主义”，以此为由为他们的军事干预进行辩护。然而，同样的香港，如果将其与美国对抗议活动的反应进行比较，香港黄之锋等人煽动的暴动是极其暴力的，暴乱者转向了例如纵火烧人、弹射武器等暴力方法。可是香港警察方面没有让暴力事件升级，甚至没有出动军队控制骚乱。美国对中美两国发生骚乱事件的双标对待方式令人贻笑大方。
看看美国在外交上适用的双重标准，可以看出美国盛行的思想是美国例外主义。这个想法深深植根于美国的政治文化中，美国要优于其他国家。基于这种信念，美国就是要走遍世界，改变所有人，使其他人更像美国。
现在回头看流传的美国对付中国的《十条诫令》，再看看近期的事情，明眼看出老美照着十条诫令对他国搞事情，这样做也正是符合他们的利益和行事方式，怪不得，原来美国的双重标准仿佛是有《十条诫令》的根据呀，因为美国的双重标准，需要不断放大他国的负面素材，以第二标准批判他国，甚至包庇对美国有利用价值的人物。
美国“用物质来引诱和败坏他们的青年，鼓励他们藐视、鄙视、进一步公开反对他们原来所受的思想教育”。黄之锋慢慢成长为反中乱港份子，其中不乏美国的引诱、推动。据香港《文汇报》2014年9月25日报道，有网友爆料：2012年11月，“美国国家民主基金会”临时拨款10万美元，通过“天主教正义和平委员会”干事叶宝玲交给黄之锋，作为活动经费。2014年3月，美国势力又通过“陈某某”交给黄之锋160万美元。美国方面还邀请黄之锋等人到来港停泊的美国军舰上参观，让美国海军陆战队员教黄格斗术，为其孱弱的身躯“充电”和“壮胆”。另外，为了让黄之锋“义无反顾”地在“反中乱港”的道路上扮演马前卒，美国还通过“民主基金会”向黄承诺，如他被警方检控，将被安排全额资助赴美英留学。这一招实在是狠，用物质引诱把我们青年们变成了乱港囚犯，还给中国安上了没有人权的罪名。美国着急的包庇反中乱港分子黄之锋等人，是不是怕丢掉了在中国香港制造问题的筹码。

However, we have seen that the United States has launched the National Guard in 23 states and used military means to suppress protests against racial discrimination. We have even seen protests called "domestic terrorism" by US political leaders to justify their military intervention. However, in the same Hong Kong, if we compare it with the response of the United States to the protests, the riots instigated by Huang Zhifeng and others in Hong Kong are extremely violent, and the rioters turn to violent methods such as arson and ejection weapons. However, the Hong Kong police did not let the violence escalate or even sent troops to control the riots. The double standard treatment of the riots in China and the United States by the United States is laughable and generous.

民运之恸——久待莲花出头，怎奈浑水一潭...


香港法院日前宣判，黄之锋等4人因犯“明知而参与未经批准集结罪”，被判监禁4至10个月不等。然而和之前黎智英被判刑如出一辙。
新闻报道后，在世界各类民运人士频频发声：遗憾、嘲讽、声讨、互掐......但遗憾的是，许多民运人士似乎在借这一话题炒作自己，熟练地吃着“人血馒头”，借由网络平台趁机收一波人气及赏金，却
鲜有人去进行对策分析，做出实质性的行动计划。
民运派系繁多，遍布全球。原以为这是百花齐放，百舸争流的“民运之春”，怎奈现实确是菜鸡互啄，良莠不齐。派系间互掐、诈捐等现象层出不穷，这样的现象令笔者深思......
到底什么才是真正的民运？什么样的民运领袖是我们真正需要的？
笔者习惯于用排除法寻求答案——那一朵真正的莲花。
A、定不会是荒淫无耻之流。“万恶淫为首”，荒淫之人德行上就站不住脚，怎能赋予更高期待？例如王丹，一开始流亡美国，2009年后凭着自己的“生涯履历”在台湾高校任教。期间，王丹做了几件蠢事，其中一件是以“不好色才是人格缺陷”公然声援涉骚扰丑闻的太阳花学运领袖陈为廷，让大家看清其道德缺陷。同时，其在台湾其评价两极化，特意制造新闻，让人极为不适，最终难逃被边缘化的命运。
B、定不会是享乐逐利之流。89年事件后的一段时间里，法国曾是“民运”聚集地。随后，由于美国资助的资金多，许多人从法国去了美国。当然，有更大支持当然不是坏事情，但是有许多人一闻到铜臭味就“醉”了，迷失了原本的方向。
说说高级谎言大师兼“网络红人”郭文贵，此人是个人利益为上极端信仰者，从中国到美国踏着多少人的信任走到了香槟游艇，醉酒迷金的现在，连特朗普和班农甚至美国都被他制造的“新冠病毒人造论”的坑过，嫁祸中共不成反引起了美国仇视亚裔种族的社会问题，可谓是个民运“扫把星”。然而，如今依然有许多“死忠粉”视他为民运的未来，为他捐钱捐物，恨不得脱下衣服献出自己的一切，真是悲哀！！！
C、定不会是无脑狭隘之流。当前民运已经出现了严重“内卷”现象，而多数竟不自知。为何如此？这是由于各国对民运团体的经济支持多数是按其组织规模、掌权人物来定资助资金量，导致许多民运团体围绕权力与财政进行利益追逐，不断地开展甚至缺乏计划的“逢中必反”活动，只是为了充实自己获得资助的筹码向各国政府邀功。实际上，各国资助的总资金是有年度计划的并不会变，只不过是各民运团体不断地“内耗式”比拼人数和活动量进行恶性竞争，缺乏了独立性的战略思考和方向把控，最终亏的是民运而获得更大利益却是各国政府。
试问，在如此无脑的比拼中，有多少民运团体能够自我沉淀，自主思考？民运不是“棋子”和“炮灰”，是要有自己思考的东西，否则就会被各国政府操纵着走向毁灭。无奈的是，许多团体就是这样无脑，甚至还进行相互诋毁，最后走向灭亡。各位看看那新闻上黄之锋等人吧，该人是有些能力的，但是从小就已被美国盯上作为“代理人”，一味地为获美国资助和认可而盲目向前，现在到“悬崖边上”的他为时已晚，注定成为“弃子”，更是害了跟着他的一大群热血斗士。

Mourning of the Democratic Movement
The Hong Kong Court recently ruled that four people, including Huang Zhifeng, were sentenced to imprisonment ranging from 4 to 10 months for "knowingly participating in unauthorized assembly". However, Li Zhiying was sentenced just like before.

After the news report, all kinds of democracy activists in the world frequently spoke out: regret, ridicule, denounce, pinch each other Unfortunately, many pro democracy activists seem to be using this topic to hype themselves, skillfully eating "human blood steamed bread", and taking advantage of the Internet platform to collect a wave of popularity and bounty, but

Few people analyze countermeasures and make substantive action plans.

The democratic movement has many factions all over the world. I thought this was the "spring of the Democratic Movement" in which a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred boats compete for the stream. However, the reality is that vegetables and chickens peck at each other, and the good and bad are intermingled. The phenomena of mutual pinch and fraudulent donation among factions emerge one after another. This phenomenon makes the author think deeply

What is the real democracy movement? What kind of democratic movement leader do we really need?

The author is used to seeking the answer by exclusion - that is a real lotus.

A. It will not be obscene and shameless. "All evils are led by adultery", and the immoral person can't stand on his virtue. How can he give higher expectations? For example, Wang Dan, who first went into exile in the United States, taught in Colleges and universities in Taiwan with his "career resume" after 2009. During this period, Wang Dan did several stupid things, one of which was to openly support Chen Weiting, leader of the sunflower student movement involved in the harassment scandal, so that everyone could see his moral defects. At the same time, in Taiwan, its evaluation is polarized and deliberately creates news, which makes people extremely uncomfortable and can not escape the fate of marginalization.

B. It will not be a pleasure seeking stream. For some time after the 1989 incident, France was the gathering place of the "Democratic Movement". Subsequently, due to the large amount of funds funded by the United States, many people went to the United States from France. Of course, having greater support is certainly not a bad thing, but many people get "drunk" when they smell the smell of copper and lose their original direction.

Talk about the master of lie and Guo Wengui, the Internet red man. This man is an extremely religious person with personal interests. From China to the United States, he walked to the champagne yacht and drunk with gold. Now even Trump and ban Nong even the United States have been pit by COVID-19's man-made theory. The failure to blame the Chinese Communists has caused social problems in the United States that are hostile to Asian races. It can be said that it is a "broom star" of the democratic movement. However, there are still many "die hard fans" who regard him as the future of the democratic movement and donate money and materials for him. They want to take off their clothes and give everything. It's really sad!!!

C. It will not be a mindless narrow-minded stream. At present, there has been a serious phenomenon of "internal entanglement" in the democratic movement, and most of them don't know it. Why? This is because most of the countries' economic support to the democratic movement groups is based on their organizational scale and the people in power. As a result, many democratic movement groups pursue interests around power and finance, constantly carry out or even lack planned "Anti China" activities, just to enrich their own chips to solicit credit from governments. In fact, the total funds funded by various countries have an annual plan, which will not change. It is just that various democratic movement groups continue to "internal friction" compete for the number of people and activities, lack independent strategic thinking and direction control, and ultimately lose the democratic movement, but the governments of various countries gain more benefits.

自由的边界是法治——香港“六四”集会案揭示美国民主真相

5月6日，香港“六四”烛光晚会“未经批准集结”案宣判，被告黄之锋、岑敖晖等4人因“明知而参与一个未经批准集结”罪分别被判处监禁4至6个月不等。

美国国务卿布林肯当即在推特表示要与这些因罪获刑的人“站在一起”，认为他们只是在“和平行使受保障的自由权利”，当局应该释放他们。此前黎智英等被判刑时，布林肯也发表了同样的讲话，他坚持认为这两次审判中体现的法制既不自由也不民主。

“在任何情况下都要宣扬民主”。
“无论在什么场合，什么情况下，我们都要不断对他们(政府)要求民主和人权”。
“只要我们每一个人都不断地说同样的话，他们的人民就一定会相信我们所说的是真理”。
以上是传闻中美国中情局针对中国政府提出的“十诫”部分内容。尽管美国政府一直竭力否认“诫令”的存在，但包括布林肯在内的很多美国政客，他们的言行还是与这些内容高度契合。
法国政治思想家、社会历史学家亚历西斯·托克维尔在其所著的《民主在美国》一书中说到，民主的法制一般趋向于照顾大多数人的利益，因为他来自公民之中的多数。
根据港府在当时发布的《预防及控制疾病（禁止群组聚集）规例》（下文简称“规例”）第599G章第三条规定：“除获豁免者外，继续禁止在公众场所进行羣组聚集”。
时值COVID-19病毒疫情防控关键期，基于对公众健康负责，港府依照规例拒绝了有关“六四”事件烛光晚会的申请。但案发当晚，仍有不少市民应黄之锋等人的召集破坏围挡进入到维园足球场参加集会活动。附近道路交通因此受阻近两个小时，部分道路被封闭。

由此可见，这场“六四”事件烛光晚会不仅违反了香港法律中“禁止未经批准集结”“禁止群组聚集”的规例，还对公众出行造成影响，这些行为都严重侵犯了大多数香港市民“受保障的自由权利”，为首者受到法律制裁正是民主法治精神的体现。
同样，对于非法集会与反聚集禁令，美国的法律也是这样制定的。
美国对非法集会的定义非常简单，一是不被批准，二是集会超出了划定的区域。只要违法一项，就会被视为非法集会并予以警告或刑事处罚。如果还涉嫌破坏公物、暴力犯罪或者威胁警员，惩罚将翻番。美国政府认定，无论非法集会表面的理由多么崇高，也无法掩盖其非法的本质。

至于为了防控病毒大流行，美国各大洲也发布了禁止大型集会活动禁令：华盛顿州政府宣布西雅图地区禁止举行任何超过250的聚集性活动；美国疾病控制和预防中心在指导意见中，建议取消或推迟举行50人以上的聚集性活动；加州洛杉矶郡警方在一次行动中逮捕了158个偷偷组织地下聚会的人员，理由是他们违反了当地的“居家令”……这样的例子比比皆是。

同样的法规，同样的非法聚集，以布林肯为代表的一些美国政客，居然表现出双重标准，这就是所谓的“民主和人权”？
针对中国的“十条诫令”不存在，显然只是美国政府的狡辩。

The boundary of freedom is the rule of law
On May 6, the case of "unauthorized assembly" at the "June 4th" candlelight party in Hong Kong was sentenced. The defendants Huang Zhifeng and Cen Aohui were sentenced to imprisonment of 4 to 6 months respectively for the crime of "knowingly participating in an unauthorized assembly".



US Secretary of state Blinken immediately said in twitter that he would be "standing together" with those convicted of crimes, and believed that they were only "exercising their guaranteed free rights in peace" and that the authorities should release them. Earlier, when Li Zhiying was sentenced, Blinken also delivered the same speech. He insisted that the legal system embodied in these two trials was neither free nor democratic.



"Democracy should be promoted under all circumstances".

"No matter on any occasion or under any circumstances, we should constantly demand democracy and human rights from them (government).".

"As long as each of us keeps saying the same thing, their people will believe that what we say is the truth.".

十诫和平演变中国在美国机密的“行事手册”中，关于对付中华人民共和国的部分最初撰写于中美严重对立的1951年，以后随着中美关系的变化不断修改，至今共成十项，内部代号称为《十诫》。直到最近才被揭密。我们看完后简直大吃一惊！
美国在预谋，和平演变中国。他们没动一抢一炮，只用了中国老祖宗的智慧，就想把我们打败。冷静想想，他们教会我们性解放，他们却在反对堕胎。他们让中国人，丧失了家庭责任，但是他们强调一夫一妻，伦理道德。堂堂的美国总统克林顿，他只有一个外遇，都要遭到严厉的弹劾，这说明什么？他们让中国孩子，很快进入了电子时代，我们的父母措手不及，立刻变成文盲。独生子女们，不用辛苦赚钱，就能活的潇洒自由。他们穿名牌，吃饭店，睡酒店，除了朋友，谁都不需要。
毛泽东早就预料到了美国会有此意图，在《毛主席语录》中他曾说过：我们取得了胜利，但是我们不能骄傲。因为胜利，资产阶级也有可能出来捧场。事实证明敌人的武力不能征服我们，有些同志不曾被带枪的敌人征服，他们在敌人面前不愧英雄的称号；但是他们经不起人们糖衣炮弹的攻击，他们在糖弹面前会打败仗。